Le dimanche 29 octobre 2006 à 09:40 +0100, Attila Kinali a écrit : > On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:08:55 -0400 > "Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A: Raw parts cost > > B: Engineering costs (design, testing, etc.) > > C: Other handling costs (overhead, packaging, etc.) > > D: Failure rate buffer (bad boards, warranty returns, etc.) > > E: Maximum discount > > F: Manufacturer profit > > G: Wholesaler profit > > H: Retailer profit > > I think you make the standard mistake of an engineer. > You shouldn't start from the raw parts costs and calculate > the endprise according to that. But rather start from what > the customers are willing to pay, substract H to F and C, > what is left has to cover D, B and A. > > If it doesn't cover what you estimate, then we have a problem. > If it does cover and we have some money left, that's our profit. > > This way you also have a better idea whether OGD1 will be > economicaly a success or not. > > Attila Kinali > That's right indeed, though I would suggest to calculate in the both way. That would give something like a simulation of the offer and the demand.
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
