On 22/11/06, Timothy Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snipped bits below..
> On the Documentation page > http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=Documentation > we list some rather detailed OGP Requirements and Specifications - > can we now erase this or move this somewhere? Do we still need it - > with no claims on it - perhaps it should disappear.
Well, there are lots of things we want do document. There is some old (but not stale) stuff on there about things like OGA, the VGA controller, address spaces, etc. We should have that somewhere.
Ok. We could move some to the OGA page - I am not sure how much should be kept. I am not sure where the VGA controller address spaces go. Perhaps we want a drivers page?
> http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=HDL_Resources ...() renamed OGP > Resources
OK. snip
> Our glossary has also grown....snip it's okay for now.
> FAQ > http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=FrequentlyAskedQuestions
snip Need some updates.
> Mailing lists > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
snip
This page is horribly out of date and needs to be replaced. Any suggestions? If not, remind me (or Attila), and we'll replace it with a stub containing instructions and a link to the wiki.
Perhaps we want all the info about OGP in the wiki and just info about the mailing lists on that page.
> about OGP > http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=AboutOpenGraphics > this has become dated. Pehaps the mission should be listed first. OGP > is in partnership with Traversal. Tech Source role has lessened in the > view of OGP and OHF (Though concerning Traversal that would likely be > different).
Tech Source is, you might say, a friendly bystander. There are lots of ways in which Traversal and Tech Source have completely different goals, which helps me, Howard, and Andy with conflicts of interest we might otherwise have. Moreover, they've done nothing at all to impede our work. They've been very generous compared to how many other graphics companies (that might see us as potential competitors) would have been. The current management there is careful but progressive and open-minded. Not that I am comparing myself to Linus, but I may have a situation with Tech Source that is better than his was at Transmeta. (Maybe. I'm just guessing.)
I wonder if that belongs on Traversal's web page. Or we could add that info under your details in the project members page. They deserve mention.
Traversal Technology has two relationships to the OGP: (1) From the PoV of the OGP, Traversal is sub-component. Some OGP members (who are still OGP members) have formed Traversal as a means to further the project's goals. The same is true for the OHF.
(2) From the PoV of the old-school corporate world, Traversal is a scrappy start-up that has found a clever way to leverage volunteer labor to drastically reduce engineering and marketing costs. I'm not sure how much of any of this should be mentioned anywhere on the wiki. I mean, how do we state two orthogonal mission statements without people getting confused?
excellent - something like this should go in.
> Verilog Lesson 1 snip a review would not hurt.
It's hard for me to tell how GOOD my lessons are. The ideal situation would be to have a list full of experts on Verilog so that more people can maintain this.
anyone want to give it a tidy or formating - feel free. There is plenty of work.
> OpengraphicsSimulator wiki 54 - what can we do with this page? Well, we do need the simulator...
;-) thanks jb _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
