On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:40:19 -0500
"Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/27/06, Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We should not call our performance estimates of OGD1/OGA
> > "performance measurements". If you want to call the
> > numbers from the other cards meassurements, then so be
> > it but we should be clear about that no OGD1 based
> > graphic card exists yet. Otherwise we'll have a hard
> > time fighting against the vapor ware claims.
>
> Actually, I'm pretty sure I had called them "performance measures",
> which is to say that they are bases and units of measurement, but they
> are not necessarily measurements.
Juup, and we should make it clear that these numbers
are pure estimates and subject to change.
Actually, and purely IMHO, we shouldn't publish
any estimates until we have something to prove
that our estimates are more or less right.
Currently, without even a PCI interface, we can
only rely on Timothys and Howards experience on
these estimates. If i wouldn't be involved in this
project and know that these two are capable of providing
realistic estimates, i would regard them as pure
imagination and declare the project to be vaporware
until proven otherwise.
Attila Kinali
--
Praised are the Fountains of Shelieth, the silver harp of the waters,
But blest in my name forever this stream that stanched my thirst!
-- Deed of Morred
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
