On Tuesday 12 December 2006 23:42, Jack Carroll wrote: > This looks very, very good for a first draft. I assume this is done > from a generic template. > > The writing quality is very professional, and that's important. > Observations: > > 1. "...by the Open Graphics Project for developing the OGA series of > graphics cards." > > Shouldn't that be either "the OGA series of open graphics > architectures" or "the OGC series of open graphics cards"?
I've noted a lot of confusion about this on the mailinglist as well. Perhaps it's time to make it clear what's what. Now, if I understand correctly the idea is that OGA is the register interface specification, OGC is the chip implementing OGA, and OGD is the development board series. So that leaves us without a name for the ASIC-based card (i.e. the PCB with an OGC on it that you stick into your computer). We don't need a definite name, a code name is good enough (geographical names seem to be popular among hardware manufacturers. IIRC they can't be trademarked, so maybe that's why). Any suggestions? Lourens
pgpNbTOzxwFcC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
