On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:09:10 -0400
"Timothy Normand Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No need to implement a complex interrupt handler that might
> > be calleded a few ms later and thus after the card has left
> > the blank time already.
>
> A few ms is a long time.
Yes, but that's what you have to work with on PCs.
AFAIK interrupt reaction time is still in the 1-2ms range
for an average PC (from interrupt asserted until ISR is called).
> It's also unlikely enough to always happen
> within such a short time of the interrupt. It's generally just better
> to do in software, because it's simpler and infrequent. It's so
> infrequent, in fact, that it doesn't really matter how inefficient it
> might be.
Yes, but there are more things that generally need to be
done during blank time. E.g. the picture flip of a video
player could be implemented this way, w/o any additional
specialized hardware. I'm not sure whether it's worth
it, but it might be interesting to test.
Attila Kinali
--
Linux ist... wenn man einfache Dinge auch mit einer kryptischen
post-fix Sprache loesen kann
-- Daniel Hottinger
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
