Le jeudi 05 juillet 2007 à 13:49 -0400, Timothy Normand Miller a écrit : > On 7/5/07, Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: snip > > > - Hardware not interesting to big companies > > > > Huh? Do you really want to tell big companies to go away? > > Perhaps some mutually beneficial arrangement can be found? > > We're not saying that hardware isn't interesting to big companies. > We're saying that the FOSS way opens up opportunities for smaller > companies to produce hardware products that aren't as interesting to > the bigger companies. > > How can we say this better?
I suggest: "lowered the threshold for small companies producing hardware" or "Threshold lowered for small companies producing hardware" > > How about: > > - Little guy can implement risky, radical concepts snip > > > - Greater self-sufficiency for FOSS community > > > > Again, this seems to be promoting us-vs-them thinking. > > Good point, although I do often feel animosity towards "evil big > companies." How can we express the idea that we're trying to give the > FOSS community some of their own open designs to work with without > alienating the big guys? Yes, it's more difficult. > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
