Man, I haven't delt with 7400's in years.  Fun to be getting my hands dirty 
again.

BTW, if one clicks on "reply" it replies to the author, not the mailing list.  
A few of my mails didn't make it onto the list as a result, sorry about that 
whomever got them.  8)

---- Timothy Normand Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jack Carroll
> 
> 
>         Historically, original 7400 logic could sink much more current to
> ground than it could pull high, and the logic-low value was better-defined.
> So if there was any risk of other signals coupling to a clock line, it made
> the most sense to change state on the negative-going transition, or to
> enable other devices on a logic-low.  Also, if you needed to drive power
> loads such as early LEDs or small relays without a buffer transistor, there
> was a chance you could do it with a current-sinking output, but not a
> sourcing output.  Most TTL derivatives, such as LS, were like that.  These
> days, most late CMOS such as HC and AC is symmetrical.  Be careful with HCT
> or ACT, though; they have unsymmetrical input logic levels, for best noist
> immunity when driven by TTL.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Timothy Normand Miller
> http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
> Open Graphics Project
> _______________________________________________
> Open-graphics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
> List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to