On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Mark Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > I've just checked this in under rtl/include. I think it should go there > because it ties in very closely with the hardware. As the verilog changes > so do the register definitions. > > My experiences with this type of thing before is that this is the correct > place for this to be at this stage of the project. Also at this stage it > makes more sense for the definitions to be regenerated in peoples local > build trees. Once we get hardware made a set of register definitions should > then be compiled for the final (for that chip) verilog, and these should > then be checked in in a different place (under a name that matches that chip > in some way).
This make sense. > If people are unhappy with the names that I have chosen or would like more > prefixes (like OG_ or OGP_ or OGD1_ added to the front of the definitions) > then speak soon. Probably OGA_. It would help avoid namespace conflicts. > > The makefile for the bios has been updated to use the .inc files generated > by this change. I think that should be a clear example of how this can be > done. Yes. Next, we'll see about talking Howard into letting us modify the diagnostic tools similarly. :) -- Timothy Normand Miller http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti Open Graphics Project _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
