On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:16 +0100, "Ing. Daniel Rozsnyó" wrote: > Raphaël Jacquot wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:09 +0100, "Ing. Daniel Rozsnyó" wrote: > >> It depends on what he wants to use it for. > >> > >> Personally, I use Microchip's ENC 28J60 10 Mb/s mac+phy for SPI, it > >> allows me to receive/send ethernet frames. No TCP. They have an improved > >> version for 10/100 Mb/s network with a parallel port access (+ spi). > >> > >> For one project I designed-in an SMSC's 10/100 MAC+PHY in one chip, that > >> had 16/32 bit parallel SRAM like interface. > >> > >> If the cost is the question, then for FPGA designs, an PHY-chip is > >> enough, with MAC implemented in fpga.. that can be the way to get to > >> 1000 Mb/s. > >> > >> For the TCP/IP stack I do not know any chips - just an assembly called > >> XPORT. Some versions have eth-serial only, some offer TCP stack. I > >> haven't worked with them.. I have my own stack now :) > >> > >> I suppose they will use some AT command set like interface, to > >> initiate/receive TCPIP. > > > > those have an arm7tdmi embedded > > others have some sort of embedded x86 proc > > > > Are they reprogrammable then? It then resembles the Rabbit modules, they > had some processor with Ethernet too. > http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/embedded-device-servers/xport-pro.html
this one runs embedded linux ! _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
