2010/9/16 <[email protected]>

> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:12:36 -0400, Andre Pouliot
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I'll look more to that link later and I'll try to give you a more
> complete
> > answer. But from what I can see in that link a few of those idea are
> already
> > present in modern processor. There also a chip from Actel(Coldfusion)
> that
> > could be of interest if you want to do some kind of adaptive computing.
> That
> > chip is an ARM cpu with a configurable analog front-end and FPGA logic
> cell.
>
> It's "SmartFusion" :-) see http://www.actel.com/
>
> It's a quite able chip, but I prefer the "old" Fusion devices,
> I have the AFS600 on a kit and it kicks ass,
> the AFS1500 is pure awesomeness (but damn expensive).
> These are dream chips for robotics, I don't see what their
> point is in a graphic card : they are expensive, not fast enough,
> the analog part is useless and the integrated Flash storage can be
> replaced
> by a cheap external SPI memory...
>
> Did I miss something ?
>
> yg
>

Not much, You were right about the name, I saw I was wrong after sending it.
It should teach me to reread before posting.
But I wasn't talking about smartfusion for graphics but more for an example
of how reconfigurable computing could look and that a few device do exist
with the capacity. There also all the Virtex 2 and 4 with the powerPC
embeded in the FPGA that can work as reconfigurable computing. Still the
smartfusion is more affordable.
The interest on on-chip flash is that everything is configured when powering
up the system. With external flash it can take some time before the chip
being programmed. That's part of the reason why we have the lattice xp2
doing the pci bridge on OGD1. The spartan take a few second to be properly
programmed and it would be too long for a computer bios.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to