Peter Stuge wrote: > I suspect that it may be difficult to get them to release bitstream > information.
By "them" I mean Microsemi of course, though there was no actual mention of them in the rest of my message. Sorry for the confusion. [email protected] wrote: >> And they've made a U-Boot and uClinux BSP, which works fine. Here I refer to Emcraft. If anyone wants to upstream the BSPs, here are patches with the 1.2.0 BSP version which is well over a year old. I have an 1.3.0 update as well, but I didn't generate patches of that. Unfortunately, I didn't record what parent commit they apply to. It took a bit of digging to find that out, so I should have saved that information. In particular the kernel is an old arm kernel which was not so easy to get hold of. http://stuge.se/linux-a2f-1.2.0.patch http://stuge.se/u-boot-a2f-1.2.0.patch When I inquired, Emcraft felt that their customers would benefit more from them working forward, rather than spending time on upstreaming the code themselves. I asked if a single person could be credited for the work and was told that the BSP had been a team effort. //Peter _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
