http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/article/view/69
Link to a PDF that talks about Hardware Lic... Opinions? On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 January 2013 21:18, Timothy Normand Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Note that inclusion of this language may not qualify this license as > >> open source per the OSI. > > > IIRC, the FSF made a statement that they're perfectly fine with companies > > using trademark protection for a brand identity. So they defend the > right > > of CentOS to maintain a more accessible fork of RHEL, and they also think > > that Red Hat is within their rights to say that CentOS cannot use the > > trademark "Red Hat" without permission. > > Rereading the thread I think the placement of my comment may have lead > to confusion: > > I meant for this comment to relate to > > === > > (9) The submitter of a Modification forfeits the right to any patents > > covered by This Work and pledges to not enforce any patents covered by > > This Work. > === > > not the trademark clause, which is probably okay. ;) > > > > -- > Eitan Adler > _______________________________________________ > Open-graphics mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com) >
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
