Timothy Normand Miller wrote:
So basically, the GPU is a moving target anyway. We should focus on meeting current scientific needs, publish lots of results, and then use our clout from this to get more funding to chase whatever the GPU evolves into next. Eh?
I read that briefly wondering wth did 'we' mean (ain't English great). But yes. I don't know if it would help to emphasize "heterogeneous computing" over "GPU" for your next developments if the GPU is truly going to be subsumed by the CPU. Who knows what funding and budgets will be over the next several years, and it would be horrid to be thought of as a one trick pony. But like I've said, it is not my field.
-John -- John R. Culp [email protected] _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
