Drop the nice folks at CERN a line and ask them for a bit of advice. They
have a CERN open source license that is for hardware and has been worked
on. Combining the Apache 2.0 with a hardware version of the GPL - A.K.A. -
CERN will likely allow you to monitize as you desire while keeping open
source goals.


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Timothy Normand Miller
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:42 PM, John Culp <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Timothy,
>>
>> Can you even assign copyright for something you are doing _related_ to
>> your probable research work at Binghamton?  Even if you are working on this
>> 100% in what you consider as your spare time, your employer may have claim
>> to the work.
>>
>
> I specifically grilled them about this and had the director of Technology
> Transfer explain to me the boundaries carefully.  If I'm not using any of
> BU's resources, they don't lay any claim to it.  And actually, it's not
> really BU; it's the state of New York, since this is a state institution.
>
> Basically, if I'm doing this from home, using my own equipment, it's the
> same as if I did outside consulting under the same terms.  I DO need to
> disclose potential conflicts of interest, and I have to keep some kind of
> paper trail that shows that my contributions were published not using BU
> resources.  That's one of the reasons I want to post code to the list using
> my gmail account.
>
>
>>
>> I only ask this as I remember the contracts I signed for my work here.
>>
>> You may have it in writing with your employer that you personally own the
>> copyright and patentable ideas in all the future works that you create
>> related to Open Graphics, and therefore can license it as you see fit, but
>> perhaps you don't.
>>
>
> There is also the issue of pre-existing IP we developed before I started
> at BU and the fact that many people consider this to be public property.  I
> may be its legal owner, but morally, I'm just its guardian.  I can't pocket
> the money myself.  My colleagues at BU understand this.
>
>
>>
>> Universities can be pretty funny when it comes to IP of any sort.  IP
>> created that is in any way related to any research that you are being paid
>> to do would probably be in a dark grey area.  I am assuming that you are a
>> professional, not an hourly employee, and you may not actually have any
>> official spare time when it comes to related work.
>>
>
> One of the things I can do is rent office space there for $200/month,
> which explicitly removes any conflicts of interest, state claims on IP, and
> allows me access to BU resources, faculty, and staff.  The instant that
> this project has revenue potential, I'm going to enter into this
> arrangement.  Meanwhile, I really can't justify that expense.  I'm just
> going to keep clear separation.
>
> Worst case, if I screw something up badly enough, NYS will take 60% of our
> revenue.
>
>
>>
>> Why don't you spend ~$1k and run your employment contracts by a lawyer
>> specializing in such things (work for hire).  I have been told that New
>> York law is in general pretty funny compared to the other states; I don't
>> know how that might effect you.
>>
>
> Do you know how much I make?  Let's just say that I took a big pay cut
> when coming to BU, so this isn't an expense I can make right now.  My
> wife's opinion (who is a lawyer, BTW, licensed in Florida and Ohio, but not
> specializing in IP law) is that I should bring this whole thing into BU and
> let NYS own it (making it necessary for me to reject many outside
> contributions) because it's better for my tenure application and doesn't
> interfere with my ACADEMIC goals.  This doesn't prevent me from releasing
> it under GPL, but it does mean that NYS would take 60% of any revenue.
>  This would also make my life a lot easier for me, except for all the flak
> I'd get from letting "the evil government" take a big chunk of money that
> belongs to the project.
>
> SHOULD I let NYS own this?
>
>
>>
>> It may be that you need to run any license though whatever legal office
>> exists at your university.  For example: Wasn't the copyright of the X
>> source originally held by MIT, but then licensed very permissively through
>> the 'MIT X License'?
>>
>
> I could probably license this under BSD or MIT, and no one in NYS would
> raise an eyebrow.  It it would prevent _us_ from getting any revenue;
> meanwhile, Apple could plop it into the iPhone 12 and make billions.  I
> don't like that.  I'm doing this for research purposes so that academics
> can have an easier time developing new GPU-related techologies, not so that
> some money-grubbing corporation can just lift our IP.  This is why I want
> to make use of copyright and even patent protection.  If a commercial
> entity wants to use that, that's great; we'll take a cut and use that to
> further our FOSS and academic goals.
>
> Anyhow, basically, this whole mess comes about because I think it's
> important that we control the revenue stream and make sure it's invested
> properly and primarily in FOSS-related projects.
>
>
>
> Maybe I'm wrong to think that.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> IANAL (obviously)
>>
>>
>> -John
>>
>> --
>> John R. Culp
>> [email protected]
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Open-graphics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.duskglow.com/**mailman/listinfo/open-graphics<http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics>
>> List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Timothy Normand Miller, PhD
> Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Binghamton University
> http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~millerti/<http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti>
> Open Graphics Project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Open-graphics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
> List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
>
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to