On 7/25/07, Bill Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's what I'm picturing -- it's a conglomeration of the ideas presented.
[snip]
My thinking with the init function is so the plugin can perform other tasks during initialization. For the ILS, parsing the IDL is an obvious setup task. An additional benefit of supplying a srfsh-internal register function is so we can setup tab-completion of commands at registration time (at some point in the future). This is obviously on the side of "more work" ;)
heh ... I'll say so. One thing this drops, though, is the command renaming which would actually give us i18n for free. I'm probably missing something, but what is all that infrastructure buying us that a simple config file controlled hash not? If you guys want, I'll work up a quick patch to do login as I've proposed. I feel like I'm not explaining it well enough ... what I'm thinking of is just much simpler than what either of you have suggested thus far. --miker
