On 7/25/07, Mike Rylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/07, Bill Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is obviously on the side of "more work" ;) > heh ... I'll say so. One thing this drops, though, is the command renaming which would actually give us i18n for free.
I'm definitely missing something. What's being i18n-ized in srfsh? That reminds me, I guess srfsh will need an additional environment variable for setting the OpenSRF locale once that exists... I'm probably
missing something, but what is all that infrastructure buying us that a simple config file controlled hash not?
I'll wait on the patch to make sure I'm understanding the proposal... -bill
