On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Jason Etheridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] >> Anyway, there are my thoughts, just off the top of my head. Is that >> heading toward what you were thinking of in terms of implementation? > > Mike, in the past, I know you were also musing using actor.cards as an > indirect link to users in places where users are referenced. So, for > example, transactions would follow the cards and not the users, and > then, for duped users you could simply move their cards to the good > users. Is this still viable/desirable? >
Desirable, yes. But slowed by the same issues I describe here, only bigger, because we'd be changing entities and the code would have to be very heavily refactored. -- Mike Rylander | VP, Research and Design | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
