http://i.imgur.com/muy2N.gif
Justin On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Jason Stephenson wrote: > Quoting Jason Stephenson <[email protected]>: > >> Stepping down from my soapbox, I see absolutely no reason for a US library >> to store a patron's SSN. A drivers' license number, perhaps, but not the >> SSN. My suggestion is to delete the field, and if someone needs to track >> such an identifier then let them figure it out within the bounds of their >> local law. > > Of course, after saying the above, I realize that their isn't a SSN field in > the patron record, but the user ident_type and ident fields. I guess the SSN > label should be removed or whatever. > > Frankly, it shouldn't be a technical issue. It is a policy issue to be > determined by each Evergreen user (and I use that term loosely). It's also > not unique to Evergreen. > > > -- > Jason Stephenson > Assistant Director for Technology Services > Merrimack Valley Library Consortium > Chief Bug Wrangler, Evergreen ILS
