On Sep 5, 2012, at 08:27 , Bill Erickson wrote: [...]
> 2. I'd like to change the definition of "showstopper", i.e. what can and > cannot make it into an RC. I propose that any reasonable bug fix may be > merged into an RC provided the commit has 3 sign-offs in total -- the author, > plus 2 additional testers. That would allow us to avoid the whole > benevolent-overlords-blessing-problems-as-showstoppers process, which is > vague and time-consuming, while maintaining a generally higher level of > quality for any fixes merged into the RC. +1 > > In other words, let the market decide. Depends on who runs the marketplace. In our case, I think it's safe enough. > If a problem merits attention (and showstoppers will), then it will be > merged. If it's not a showstopper in the traditional sense, but really > improves things, it can get merged too. +1 Thanks, Bill! Alexey Lazar PALS Information System Developer and Integrator 507-389-2907 http://www.mnpals.org/
