Hi, On 09/05/2012 11:41 AM, Bill Erickson wrote:
Surely there's a psychological difference between 2.2.3 and 2.3.0, but I don't see one in practice. If anything, 2.2.3 has *more* cause to be handled with kid gloves, since 2.2 is much more widely used in production systems.
.0 releases often feel bigger, but I agree with your overall point that we should avoid brown-bagging *any* release, be it a functionality release or a minor bugfix release.
I actually support triple-signoffs as a matter of course -- author, tester, QAer, for example -- but I don't think we've got enough numbers yet to do that without unduly slowing down the flow of code.
Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Director of Support and Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: [email protected] direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org
