I second that. Icinga looks like an interesting option, I hope to try it out soon. Any suggestions or warnings regarding that?
Aleksey On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:43 , Duimovich, George wrote: > Thanks all for your feedback. > > George > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David > Busby > Sent: November 5, 2012 11:14 > To: Evergreen Development Discussion List > Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server Monitoring > > Icinga is a fork, you will likely not notice a difference unless you dig > around in the guts or try to build a distributed monitoring solution. I've > used both but currently run with a home-grown solution. > > On Nov 5, 2012 8:11 AM, "Peters, Michael" <[email protected]> wrote: > Nagios, for sure. Couldn’t live without it. > > > > -Mike > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Duimovich, George > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 10:49 AM > To: Evergreen Development Discussion List > Subject: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server Monitoring > > > > Hello all, > > > > Is it correct to assume that Nagios remains the most frequently used server > monitoring plug-in, or is there any move in the works with some sites to use > something new / other alternatives. > > > > IIRC ESI's nagios plug-in remains the best option, correct? > > > > George > > > > George Duimovich > > NRCan Library / Bibliothèque de RNCan > > > > > > > Alexey Lazar PALS Information System Developer and Integrator 507-389-2907 http://www.mnpals.org/
