> > Interesting enough, I am about to start work on a separate (non-Evergreen) > project to migrate a 220+ document manual to a new platform (from html + > pdf). ...
> [etc.] > > I am interested in Docbooks [sic] and I especially like the > crosswalkability of xml.... These two sentences are revealing of some of the advantages of the standards-based, XML-based, single-source-docs approach. Even valid, well-formed DocBook XML isn't going to provide "turnkey" migration, but at least with XML the documentation isn't locked into HTML/PDF formats (or as Robin noted tangentially, wiki formats). -- -- | Karen G. Schneider | Community Librarian | Equinox Software Inc. "The Evergreen Experts" | Toll-free: 1.877.Open.ILS (1.877.673.6457) x712 | [email protected] | Web: http://www.esilibrary.com | Be a part of the Evergreen International Conference, May 20-22, 2009! | http://www.lyrasis.org/evergreen
_______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
