On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:51:46PM -0400, Galen Charlton wrote: > Hi, > > On Apr 15, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Soulliere, Robert wrote: > > I watered down the DocBook stylesheet to only include the database tables > > without comments. It has been watered down because the database schema is > > massive as is. Including table comments would currently includes repetitive > > licensing preamble for every table thus increasing the size of this > > appendix quite a bit. > > I think this has been discussed before, but is there any reason not to remove > or at least significantly trim the license preamble from in-database > comments? Copyright and license are stated in the source SQL files that > initialize the schema, and the lengthy header does interfere with the > usability of the comments.
I don't recall a discussion about this, but I'm entirely in favour of removing the license headers from the in-database comments and just keeping the license header in "--" comments at the top of each file, for the reason that you state. _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
