Hi, On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Jane Sandberg <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) What role the big, classic manuals should play on this page, and
From the peanut gallery, I think they should continue to exist for the sake of not breaking links, but I could see de-emphasizing their presentation. More on that thought below. > 2) What terminology we want to use for the re-organized manuals. > Currently, they are listed as "Mini Books". "Mini Books" doesn't tell me much -- I suggest maybe just calling them "Manuals" or "Topic-specific Manuals" or the like? The classic consolidated manuals could then end up at the bottom of the list, e.g., something like this: Evergreen 3.0 - Manuals * Acquisitions (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * Cataloging (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * Circulation (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * Command line admin (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * Integrating with other tools (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * OPAC (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * Serials (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * Staff client admin (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) * Consolidated manual (HTML) (PDF) (ePub) On a completely different note, I noticed just now that the consolidated manuals for 3.0 and master are still incorporating the 2.12 release notes, not the 3.0 ones. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Infrastructure and Added Services Manager Equinox Open Library Initiative phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) email: [email protected] web: https://equinoxInitiative.org direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
