Could we think of a name other than "master" for that? I don't think it would convey much to documentation readers who don't work with git.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Kathy Lussier <[email protected]> wrote: > I prefer de-emphasizing over moving. It's good to have the link there for > those new to documentation who may not know that the master documentation > exists. > > Kathy > > > On 10/06/2017 10:54 AM, Galen Charlton wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Jane Sandberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I should have added the question earlier, but should we include the >>> documentation for master on the main documentation page? It seems >>> like something only a few people (mainly DIG members and developers) >>> would be interested in. >> >> I think the master branch documentation could be either de-emphasized >> on the main page or moved. >> >> Regards, >> >> Galen > > > -- > Kathy Lussier > Project Coordinator > Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative > (508) 343-0128 > [email protected] > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier > > > _______________________________________________ > OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation -- Jane Sandberg Electronic Resources Librarian Linn-Benton Community College [email protected] / 541-917-4655 Pronouns: she/her/hers or they/them/theirs _______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list [email protected] http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
