Karen, To add my two cents, I agree with Brandon that the Open-ILS "brand" could continue to be used in certain parts of the development project. The fact that Evergreen is open source was also a big draw for me getting involved with all this, and having that word "open" in there somewhere prominently would keep that association "up front," so to speak. As to retiring "open-ils" as the domain - that's probably a good idea, since Evergreen is now a well-known brand in itself.
Chris Sharp PINES System Administrator Georgia Public Library Service 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, GA 30345-4304 (404) 235-7147 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 8:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Evergreen Discussion @ Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is it time to begin retiring open-ils.org? Karen, It is a good idea to do the evergreen-ils.org to better represent the software being discussed/supported. However, I think 2 things are also important: 1. Don't use multiple domains. That'll just get confusing over the long run. Redirecting the existing domain is a good idea but use xxxxxx.evergreen-ils.org where xxxxxx is "www" or other host names depending on the application. (www, test, staging, irc and so on as needed). That'll maintain brand recognition. 2. keep OpenILS somehow related to the name. At least for me one of the key "selling" points is that the software is totally open and available. This should continue to be part of the brand. Maybe the name of the software should be "Evergreen: an OpenILS". That's my 2 US Cents worth. RobertC On Thu Aug 7 16:23 , 'Karen G. Schneider' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >When I got involved with Evergreen one of my questions was "What is >'open-ils'?" I found out it was an early name for the software code that >would become Evergreen. > >I've been asking various people in the Evergreen community for a few >weeks, "What do you think about the idea of retiring 'open-ils'... for >example, moving to evergreen-ils.org (and have it also respond >toevergreenils.org, and redirect from open-ils.org), eventually renaming >the lists, IRC channels, etc.?" We reserved both domain names, by the >way. So far everyone I've talked to likes the idea (or at least agrees >with it). But that's still a small group of people. > >So now I'm surfacing the question to this list. What do you think? Is it >time to have our web address, etc. reflect the name, Evergreen? I know >my own reasons for preferring the change (my early name was Pooh Bear, >but nobody except my mother calls me that any more...and you can't >Google me up that way), but I'm just one voice in the community. > >(Incidentally, open-ils will probably never really "go away"--it's >embedded in parts of Evergreen's code. So we'd have that nostalgic >connection.) > >-- >| Karen G. "No, you cannot call me Pooh Bear" Schneider >| Community Librarian >| Equinox Software Inc. "The Evergreen Experts" >| Toll-free: 1.877.Open.ILS (1.877.673.6457) x712 >| E-Mail/AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >| Web: http://www.esilibrary.com >
