A very good discussion.

It's only been less than a week, but so far I haven't heard any objections to the core suggestion.

The idea Brandon, Chris, and David raise sounds a lot like a tagline, as in:

Evergreen: Open Library Software

or

Evergreen ILS: Open, Strong, Secure

Etcetera...

Taglines aren't important when you get so big everyone knows what you represent, but they can be helpful in establishing something not as well-known. Note that Evergreen isn't the only open ILS, so ideally, the tagline should establish what makes Evergreen what it is.

Karen G. Schneider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

David Christensen wrote:
I've been following the Open-ILS / Evergreen development for a long while, and I'm just starting to get my feet wet with a test installation. For what it's worth, I agree with Brandon :-) -David Christensen

On 8/8/08, *Sharp, Chris* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Karen,

    To add my two cents, I agree with Brandon that the Open-ILS "brand"
    could continue to be used in certain parts of the development project.
    The fact that Evergreen is open source was also a big draw for me
    getting involved with all this, and having that word "open" in there
    somewhere prominently would keep that association "up front," so to
    speak.  As to retiring "open-ils" as the domain - that's probably
    a good
    idea, since Evergreen is now a well-known brand in itself.

    Chris Sharp
    PINES System Administrator
    Georgia Public Library Service
    1800 Century Place, Suite 150
    Atlanta, GA 30345-4304
    (404) 235-7147
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    -----Original Message-----
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On
    Behalf Of
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 8:34 PM
    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Evergreen
    Discussion @ Group
    Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Is it time to begin retiring
    open-ils.org <http://open-ils.org>?

    Karen,
    It is a good idea to do the evergreen-ils.org
    <http://evergreen-ils.org> to better represent the
    software
    being discussed/supported.  However, I think 2 things are also
    important:
    1. Don't use multiple domains. That'll just get confusing over the
    long
    run.
    Redirecting the existing domain is a good idea but use
    xxxxxx.evergreen-ils.org <http://xxxxxx.evergreen-ils.org>
    where xxxxxx is "www" or other host names depending on the
    application.
    (www,
    test, staging, irc and so on as needed).  That'll maintain brand
    recognition.
    2. keep OpenILS somehow related to the name. At least for me one
    of the
    key
    "selling" points is that the software is totally open and available.
    This should
    continue to be part of the brand.  Maybe the name of the software
    should
    be
    "Evergreen: an OpenILS".

    That's my  2 US Cents worth.

    RobertC


Reply via email to