On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Cynthia Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > I've checked some other catalogues, it appears to be a general problem, not > just local to us.
Cynthia, Could you double check your indicators for the 245 field? There's a convoluted reason this happens involving how we use the MODS format for display, and I think the problem should be going away at some point in 1.6 with the new bib template infrastructure. But in the meantime, tweaking your indicators should help in some cases. -- Jason Etheridge | VP, Tactical Development | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
