Your permission level must be set at Grand Poobah. As for 2.0, wouldn't we all like to know?
George Tuttle Computer Services Librarian Piedmont Regional Library System 770-867-2762 x103 770-891-0654 (cell) 770-867-7483 (fax) [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lori Bowen Ayre Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:19 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Auto-marking overdue item feature What does it mean to be an administrator feature but also "auto-marking." That sounds mutually exclusive to me. How will it be implemented differently in 2.0? Lori On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:12 AM, George Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote: > What I found out about the auto-marking overdue item feature: > 1) Auto-marking items as lost after specific overdue period is an > administrator feature in Evergreen 1.6 > 2) This feature will also be included in Evergreen 2.0 > 3) It has been successfully deployed by Evergreen Indiana. > 4) My flowchart of the process: http://prlib.org/Blog/OverdueToLost2.JPG > (Contact me if it doesn't seem quite right). > > How customizable is it? The key variable is the number of overdue days. > > How customizable should it be? As a general rule, simple is better. Though > you want your ILS to support your library's policy, you also have to > appreciate that detrimental effect of making software overly complex or > deviating drastically from the basic software. > > Questions? Thoughts? Corrections? > > George Tuttle (http://www.prlib.org/) > Piedmont Regional Library System > > > > >
