I've recently started batch editing with some test jobs and would comment:
 
* I don't think there's a limit to number of records, only depending upon the 
job and volume, it could be considerably faster working directly with database 
via SQL.   I'm currently running a delete MARC 9xx tag job on our test 
environment with over 200K+ records targetted via a csv file. After a bit of 
delay (looked like nothing was happening at first with the Batch Edit screen), 
it's now doing its thing happily. I'm pretty certain my particular replace 
would be much faster by sql, but I'm trying to use the Batch editor more to get 
a handle on how it can be best used.
 
* Re: subfield... I've had good success in my tests working at the subfield 
level (e.g. deleting specific subfield/data in a given tag, matching this or 
that text string, etc.) but I'm not sure about your particular add/append 
scenario.  
 
Oddly enough, I completely forgot about this new feature in 2.1, so only 
"re-discovered" it recently. Kind of like, "hey, where'd that menu option come 
from?" 
 
George
George Duimovich 
NRCan Library / Bibliothèque de RNCan 

 
________________________________

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim 
Spindler
Sent: February 9, 2012 12:09
To: [email protected]; Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Batch MARC editing in Evergreen 2.2


Mary, 

I'm just starting to look at this and can I add another question?  Is there  a 
limit on the number of records batch edit can handle?

Tim


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mary Llewellyn <[email protected]> wrote:


        

        Hi all,

        Yesterday I tried out MARC batch editing in our test version of 
Evergreen 2.2, and I have a question. (What else is new?)

        

        Is there a way to append subfields to an existing tag without replacing 
the entire tag? We use subfield 9 in tag 856 for our libraries that subscribe 
to Overdrive, and when a new library joins, I'd like to be able to add a new 
subfield 9 to a batch of records for them. So far, my attempts have only wiped 
the entire 856, creating it anew with just the subfields 9. Can the batch 
editor work at just the subfield level, or is it intended to work only on an 
entire tag?

        Thanks,

        Mary

        

        Mary Llewellyn

        Database Manager

        Bibliomation, Inc.

        Middlebury, CT

        [email protected]

        




-- 
Tim Spindler
[email protected] 

P   Go Green - Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really 
necessary.

 


Reply via email to