Hello,
If the consortium have branches that utilize the same copy locations, would it
be good practice to make the consortium own the copy locations or would it be
better for the individual branches to own the copy locations?
That is to say, given a consortium with branches that have the same copy
locations, what is the difference if the consortium owns the copy location or
if the individual branches own the copy locations (same location names repeated
per branch)?
Getting somewhat confused trying to wrap my mind around the two concept and
their implications, and would appreciate greatly if anyone could shed some
light on this.
Thank you!
