Hi Mary, I have not heard of this problem before. I tried a quick test on my dev server (running master) and was unable to reproduce it. I'm probably missing some important nuance of the test data/setup, though. I would suggest opening a Launchpad ticket. If possible, it would be good to see the SQL logs showing the limit-by-invoiceable query that is failing to find the correct records.
-b On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Mary Llewellyn <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, especially you acq libraries…**** > > ** ** > > I’m getting ready to train in the acquisitions module at one of our member > libraries that has 2 branches in its system, and I’ve run into something > unexpected. I’d like to get an understanding of what’s happening, if not an > outright fix, before I train their staff. **** > > ** ** > > Scenario: I log in as Branch 1. **** > > ** ** > > I’m able to create a PO with items from Branch 1 and Branch 2 and activate > the order. When I go to Acquisitions/Create Invoice and set up the invoice > and I try using the search tab on the invoice to get a list of items to add > to the invoice, (searching by provider), if I have the box checked to > filter by invoiceable items, I don’t get results when the lineitem includes > copies from both branches. If I uncheck that box, then the lines with both > branches will appear and I can add them to the invoice.**** > > ** ** > > I know I can create an invoice from a PO, but the object here is to be > able to invoice without necessarily knowing the PO, for items that may be > coming from several POs.**** > > ** ** > > Clearly, the system is seeing the lines from Branch 2 as “uninvoiceable,” > but I don’t know why. **** > > ** ** > > I’ve tried setting up the invoice receiver as system level or as Branch 1. > I get the same results either way.**** > > The provider is owned by the system.**** > > The fund account is owned by the system.**** > > Our invoice permissions, indeed, most of our acq permissions are set to > system level.**** > > ** ** > > Either I’ve missed a setting somewhere, or there’s a glitch in the > software.**** > > ** ** > > We are using Evergreen 2.4-ish, but it’s also happening in our test > database with 2.5.**** > > ** ** > > Has anyone else encountered this?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > Mary**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Mary Llewellyn**** > > Database Manager**** > > Bibliomation, Inc.**** > > 24 Wooster Ave.**** > > Waterbury, CT 06708**** > > [email protected]**** > > ** ** > -- Bill Erickson | Senior Software Developer | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://esilibrary.com | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
