Hi Donald,

This proposal wouldn't make any changes to the subject links on the bib record. It would only affect the display of subjects in the browse list.

Thanks for the feedback!

Kathy

Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
[email protected]
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
#evergreen IRC: kmlussier

On 8/29/2014 10:42 AM, Donald Butterworth wrote:
Both these proposals sound like a great improvement to me. One question, will the hot links for the dashed subject entries on the bibliographic screen point to the subject browse result screen or the subject keyword result screen?

Personally I would like to see all hot links on the bib screen point to browse result screens. e.g. author/editor/contributor, series, subject, title, and call number.

How does that sound everyone?

Don


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Kathy Lussier <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi all,

    Recently, NOBLE made some local customizations to
    config.metabib_field to improve browse search on their local
    system. They would like to contribute a branch to make these
    changes in Evergreen for 2.next, but I wanted to share their
    changes with the community first to see if can generate some
    community consensus around the changes.

    1. We would like to submit a branch that enables browse search for
    the complete (All Subjects) field, and disables it for the all of
    the other fields that are included in the subject class. This
    branch would also add a -- joiner so that the fields properly
    display separators. Currently, Evergreen is indexing the
    individual subdivisions. By enabling browse for the complete
    field, we see the full heading in the subject browse. By disabling
    browse for all of the other subject indexes, we remove
    subdivisions like handbooks, manuals, etc. as something that is
    currently being displayed as a standalone heading (not very useful
    to the user.) This branch would address the bugs reported in
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1331506 and in
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1331524.

    Based on previous discussions on this topic, I'm fairly sure most
    end users will prefer these defaults. However, I just want to make
    sure this is desired before we submit any changes.

    The changes would be supplied in the seed data for new Evergreen
    installs, but, because we don't want to break any customizations
    that may have been made to existing index definitions, most likely
    won't be applied for upgrades. However, we could probably supply a
    SQL statement in the release notes that lets existing sites know
    how to make these changes if they want them.

    2. The second change we would like to make affects the ease with
    which users can find titles starting with initial articles.
    Currently, most of the title indexes honor non-filing indicators,
    so that a title like "The Help" will ignore "the" and file "The
    Help" with the H's. If a patron inadvertently enters "the help,"
    there is a warning that can be enabled telling the patron they may
    want to try the search without "the." However, in investigating
    the bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1321780, we
    discovered that the 740 field is being handled a little
    differently because it is being indexed twice, once with the
    non-filing characters and once without . For example, in one
    catalog, "the heart sutra" is being indexed with the h's, but is
    also being indexed with the t's (for the).

    We would like to propose that this approach be used for all title
    indexes. With this approach, the user will find a title whether or
    not they include the initial articles in their search. It reduces
    the amount of training that needs to be done to teach users how to
    use the catalog.

    Of course, these additional indexes could remain a customization
    that is just handled locally, but, since it makes it easier for a
    patron or student to use browse, we think it's worthy of
    consideration for the default indexes.

    Both of these changes have already been made to the NOBLE catalog.
    You can see these changes in action at
    http://evergreen.noblenet.org/eg/opac/browse.

    Kathy

-- Kathy Lussier
    Project Coordinator
    Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
    (508) 343-0128 <tel:%28508%29%20343-0128>
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
    #evergreen IRC: kmlussier




--
Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
(859) 858-2227

Reply via email to