Hi Galen,
I can see removing the options from the advanced search page to avoid
confusion for users; I'd also be curious to see some results from
trawling logs to see how frequently they get used (and might do some
of that myself). IMO, the underlying features of the search grammar
still belong in the search engine, though.
Yes, I agree. I just wanted to remove the options from the advanced
search page. I agree the ability should continue to be available for
those who know how to construct the query.
Kathy
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
[email protected]
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
#evergreen IRC: kmlussier
On 9/29/2014 1:48 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Kathy Lussier <[email protected]> wrote:
Rather than present a search option to our users that has a higher
likelihood of leading to unsuccessful search results than our other search
options, I would like to see if there is willingness in the community to
remove these options in the next (March/April) release of Evergreen.
I can see removing the options from the advanced search page to avoid
confusion for users; I'd also be curious to see some results from
trawling logs to see how frequently they get used (and might do some
of that myself). IMO, the underlying features of the search grammar
still belong in the search engine, though.
Regards,
Galen
