Holly, I'm late to the conversation, but here is what I think I would do in
I would place all the holds and then suspend any that were currently checked
out. I'm assuming they would all be copy holds since you want to evaluate
specific copies. I don't believe a suspended hold would block a renewal.
There is a bug open about adding back the ability to suspend at time of hold
placement that would streamline this part a little bit. Bug
Then on a regular basis I would run a report showing which of the copies that I
have suspended holds on are now (available/reshelving/checked out with no other
holds and no more renewals allowed) and activate those holds. I would probably
do that for a certain amount of time and then throw up my hands and activate
the rest, just to get done with the process in a bounded time period. Or just
set a specific activation date when suspending, so they would go live after 2
months, no matter what.
An sql query could do the work of checking for availability and activating the
If you caught the copy at the stage that it has no other holds and all renewals
had been used, then it would be pretty seamless, when activated against
available items you will cause more staff work by adding items to the pull list.
Josh Stompro - LARL IT Director
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Holly
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 7:40 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group (email@example.com)
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] opposite of force/recall hold
A staff member needs to put a lot of DVDs on hold to assess the physical
condition, but is in no rush. We don't want to prevent patrons from renewing
items they have just because of our staff hold.
In other words, we're looking for something that's the opposite of the
force/recall hold types. A "timid" hold....a pushover that's okay with being
sent to the back of the line until absolutely no one else cares about the item.
It would speak up only after the item is checked in and moves to Available
Anyone else feel this would be a useful addition? Or maybe there's a way to
make this process work with the existing ILS functions? Thanks!
Homer Public Library
907-235-3180 (main desk)