Darn it! autogen strikes again!
I had put it in my procedure for the actual upgrade but must have
forgotten to actually do it on the test system.
Thanks so much Kathy! Sorry for the noise. :)
On 7/10/2017 3:33 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
Hi John,
It works fine for me on a system where I'm using the unified volume/copy
editor.
Did you run autogen after performing your upgrade? I don't recall the
exact problem, but I remember there was a previous a problem with using
that 'edit' link if autogen isn't run.
Kathy
On 07/10/2017 03:19 PM, John Merriam wrote:
Hello. We are testing 2.12.3 and have noticed a problem.
If we search for an item in the catalog in the staff client and then
click the 'edit' link that shows up next to the barcode (comes from
templates/opac/parts/record/copy_table.tt2), it brings it up in the
copy editor.
We make our changes (something simple such as changing circ mod) in
the copy editor and then click the Re-barcode/Update Items button and
we get an error that says "error with item update: An item with the
same barcode exists".
If we pull up the same item in the copy editor a different way (not
from edit link in OPAC view) such as going to Holdings Maintenance
under Actions for this Record and then double clicking the record, we
can make changes to it and everything works fine with no errors when
we click Re-barcode/Update Items.
The screens are the same from everything we can see. The same
function, xulG.volume_item_creator() is called in both places in the
code (looks to me like the arguments are different in the
copy_table.tt2 call though?). We are at a loss as to what the problem
could be. It works fine in our 2.9 system.
Does anyone have any ideas as to what could be going on here? Thanks!
--
John Merriam
Evergreen System Specialist
Bibliomation, Inc.
24 Wooster Ave.
Waterbury, CT 06708
203-577-4070 x108
