Hi Jason, If you mean in terms of use and rights, no there is no reason, maybe we can call it "thoughtlessness". As you can notice it is just open source and it will be great if it the community embraces it...
-----Original Message----- From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Jason Stephenson Sent: maandag 30 oktober 2017 12:53 To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen as OAI-PMH provider - any plans? Erhan, Is there any reason that this has not been shared with the community as a potential enhancement? I think this would be a good feature for stock Evergreen to have, and then your institution would not be solely responsible for maintaining it. Jason On 10/30/2017 06:12 AM, Erhan Tuskan wrote: > Dear all, > > The International Institute of Social History (IISH) in Amsterdam has already > developed an OAI-PMH service for Evergreen. We have been using it for a long > time. > > You can find here more information about the service: > > https://github.com/IISH/Evergreen/blob/iish_master_rel_3_0_1/OAI2.md > > For further details you can also contact Lucien van Wouw (l...@iisg.nl) > > Best regards, > > Erhan Tuskan > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Open-ils-general > [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf > Of Linda Jansova > Sent: maandag 30 oktober 2017 8:28 > To: Evergreen Discussion Group > <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org>; Evergreen Discussion > Group <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org> > Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen as OAI-PMH provider - any plans? > > Hi, > > We are just considering drafting a grant proposal to get funding for adding > OAI-PMH provider capability to Evergreen (possibly via OpenSRF and a piece of > software which would get data from Evergreen). If our proposal is accepted, > then it is rather likely that the project output would be ready by the end of > 2018. > > Just a quick question before we proceed further - is there anyone else > also considering OAI-PMH provider development? (Just want to make sure > that we do not duplicate someone else's efforts.) > > Thank you in advance! > > Linda >
