Thanks for the positive responses.
If we understood the dokuwiki correctly, we are going to make a pull request this week as described in the section "Submitting code to the project" section From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Linda Jansova Sent: maandag 30 oktober 2017 1:41 To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen as OAI-PMH provider - any plans? It would be great if the code was integrated into Evergreen master! I have been searching high and low and failed to come across the your code and some others who may be interested in using it might find themselves in exactly the same situation. Erhan, there is a dokuwiki page that details how to contribute code: https://wiki.evergreen-ils.org/doku.php?id=contributing. Maybe it will be helpful (especially in case you have not contributed code yet). A side note - we have developed a module to pull external content from our Czech provider and also shared it with the community (http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/3.0/_including_external_content_in_your_public_interface.html), meaning that now it is very easy for everyone interested to find it and virtually just switch it on :-). Linda On 10/30/2017 01:22 PM, Rogan Hamby wrote: I think adding it as a feature in a future release would be a good thing. While not a make or break feature it's a part of the open ecosystem that Evergreen users ten to adopt and certainly a welcome enhancement IMO. Rogan Hamby Data and Project Analyst Equinox Open Library Initiative phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) email: ro...@equinoxinitiative.org<mailto:ro...@equinoxinitiative.org> web: http://EquinoxInitiative.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Erhan Tuskan <e...@iisg.nl<mailto:e...@iisg.nl>> wrote: Hi Jason, If you mean in terms of use and rights, no there is no reason, maybe we can call it "thoughtlessness". As you can notice it is just open source and it will be great if it the community embraces it... -----Original Message----- From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org>] On Behalf Of Jason Stephenson Sent: maandag 30 oktober 2017 12:53 To: open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen as OAI-PMH provider - any plans? Erhan, Is there any reason that this has not been shared with the community as a potential enhancement? I think this would be a good feature for stock Evergreen to have, and then your institution would not be solely responsible for maintaining it. Jason On 10/30/2017 06:12 AM, Erhan Tuskan wrote: > Dear all, > > The International Institute of Social History (IISH) in Amsterdam has already > developed an OAI-PMH service for Evergreen. We have been using it for a long > time. > > You can find here more information about the service: > > https://github.com/IISH/Evergreen/blob/iish_master_rel_3_0_1/OAI2.md > > For further details you can also contact Lucien van Wouw > (l...@iisg.nl<mailto:l...@iisg.nl>) > > Best regards, > > Erhan Tuskan > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Open-ils-general > [mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org>] > On Behalf > Of Linda Jansova > Sent: maandag 30 oktober 2017 8:28 > To: Evergreen Discussion Group > <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org>>; > Evergreen Discussion > Group > <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org>> > Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Evergreen as OAI-PMH provider - any plans? > > Hi, > > We are just considering drafting a grant proposal to get funding for adding > OAI-PMH provider capability to Evergreen (possibly via OpenSRF and a piece of > software which would get data from Evergreen). If our proposal is accepted, > then it is rather likely that the project output would be ready by the end of > 2018. > > Just a quick question before we proceed further - is there anyone else > also considering OAI-PMH provider development? (Just want to make sure > that we do not duplicate someone else's efforts.) > > Thank you in advance! > > Linda >
