Erez Zilber wrote: > This new thread summarizes and continues a discussion that we (Mike, Or > and myself) had outside the list. This is what we have so far: > > * Having a parent device: commit > 62786b526687db54c6dc22a1786d6df8b03da3f3 in the bnx2i branch looks > ok, and will solve the DMA mask problem. I think that it's cleaner > than calling slave_alloc etc. However, this code cannot be used > outside the bnx2i branch. I think that we need to create another > patch (based on this one) to submit upstream. Mike - what do you > think?
Oh yeah, you will want to reclone my tree. Some patches were broken or diffd incorrectly, so I rebuilt the tree. I made the endpoint code more generic for iser, bnx2i and one day chelsio. You want several patches in there related to the iscsi_endpoint stuff. Commit 0d199fdee8740bcb1dbc3e33bbe5b03996f7be2b was the initial endpoint code and a2212ba43dc9db30e203d0a2d244b5b2569c72c8 was the iser conversion and fix to iser to set the host's parent based on the endpoint's parent. I also added some compat code so that older tools would continue to work with newer iser modules. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---