Pete Wyckoff wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:20 -0500:
>> Erez Zilber wrote:
>>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>>> Erez Zilber wrote:
>>>>> This new thread summarizes and continues a discussion that we (Mike, Or
>>>>> and myself) had outside the list. This is what we have so far:
>>>>>     * Having a parent device: commit
>>>>>       62786b526687db54c6dc22a1786d6df8b03da3f3 in the bnx2i branch looks
>>>>>       ok, and will solve the DMA mask problem. I think that it's cleaner
>>>>>       than calling slave_alloc etc. However, this code cannot be used
>>>>>       outside the bnx2i branch. I think that we need to create another
>>>>>       patch (based on this one) to submit upstream. Mike - what do you
>>>>>       think?
>>>> I am going to push that code soon. Since it is not critical for 2.6.26 I 
>>>> am waiting to push it for .27.
>>> I agree - the DMA mask is not so urgent. However, as you said, Pete is
>>> waiting with his patch. Do you want to post something in linux-scsi?
>> Yeah, will do. I ccd him here too, so we could talk about the dma alignment 
>> patch.
> Sorry for the delay.  This commit id has changed, and I'm not
> finding what you mean.  Perhaps this is the endpoint stuff,
> which is good.

Sorry about that. I had to redo some patches. It is the endpoint stuff.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to