Pete Wyckoff wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:20 -0500: >> Erez Zilber wrote: >>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>> Erez Zilber wrote: >>>> >>>>> This new thread summarizes and continues a discussion that we (Mike, Or >>>>> and myself) had outside the list. This is what we have so far: >>>>> >>>>> * Having a parent device: commit >>>>> 62786b526687db54c6dc22a1786d6df8b03da3f3 in the bnx2i branch looks >>>>> ok, and will solve the DMA mask problem. I think that it's cleaner >>>>> than calling slave_alloc etc. However, this code cannot be used >>>>> outside the bnx2i branch. I think that we need to create another >>>>> patch (based on this one) to submit upstream. Mike - what do you >>>>> think? >>>>> >>>> I am going to push that code soon. Since it is not critical for 2.6.26 I >>>> am waiting to push it for .27. >>>> >>> I agree - the DMA mask is not so urgent. However, as you said, Pete is >>> waiting with his patch. Do you want to post something in linux-scsi? >> Yeah, will do. I ccd him here too, so we could talk about the dma alignment >> patch. > > Sorry for the delay. This commit id has changed, and I'm not > finding what you mean. Perhaps this is the endpoint stuff, > which is good. >
Sorry about that. I had to redo some patches. It is the endpoint stuff. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---