Hi,
i run a performance-test on
a) our native solaris snv90 system AND
b) on an exported volume from this solaris-snv90 to an xen04-fedora-
core8 using open-iscsi 2.0-869
*** bonnie @ native storage10 (blade16) against pool1 @ 100GB-EVA-
RAID10-LUN @diskgroup2
Version 1.03c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
%CP /sec %CP
storage10 8G 118090 65 98855 17 74481 17 153372 95 251149
20 1037 2
*** bonnie @ xen04, iscsi-import von 20GB-Volume @ solaris exorted
Volume @ 100GB-EVA-RAID10-LUN @diskgroup2, Ethernet: 1GB, jumboframes
enabled on both systems
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
%CP /sec %CP
xen04.test.softw 1G 54601 95 126731 23 43890 7 47820 93 116211
12 8979 18
I think, the limitation is the iscsi-implementation of solaris or
openiscsi ...
Is there a possibility to get the iscsi-benchmark closer to the native
HDD-benchmark ?
regards
Danny
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
