Hi I would say "Yes, but..." :-)
I imagine it would give you High Avaliability against your switch, and possibly double the throughput. But using separate NICs, separate switches and DM-Multipath would give you the same thing, only all the way through to the SAN. Den 3 Dec, 2009 kl. 12:04 skrev Ciprian Marius Vizitiu (GBIF): > Hi everybody, > > Just wondering if anybody's got any experience with the bonding driver > (and LACP on the switch) used as an iSCSI path? "OK"? "Don't do > it!"? "Yes, but..."? > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "open-iscsi" group. > To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en. > > -- Morten Johansen mor...@bzzt.no -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
