Mike Christie wrote: > .39. I am still waiting on test results from others, so I think by the > time they are done it will be late in .38
make sense, if possible, lets just have things sent to James whenever they're ready and not just before the .39 merge window... > It is ok. It is same approach > for the fix where the iscsi class detects the leak and forces cleanup. make sense > The only changes are that in the patch on the list, > I had included other non-related changes to make it easier to test so more patches are expected soon or its all little cleanups which may come at some point but not necessarily now? > support single connection sessions. I was thinking I should just remove > it, but then I thought for LIO target mode we can support MC/s so maybe > one day we can support it in the initiator again (who knows though). re LIO, maybe you can help clarify something... looking on the the merged code I wasn't sure if it actually contains an implementation for iscsi target or its only framework/hooks? > iscsi_conn_bind required the caller to pass the ep). I decided to move > that management to the iscsi class, because the iscsi class was the one > that was actually using those pointers to track the state yes, I see this now, makes sense Or. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
