On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:52:57AM -0600, Michael Christie wrote: > Or and Shlomo, I am going to just revert the patch for now until I can > do some performance testing with a patch to add back correct locking > and also re-rerview the patch. Maybe instead of locks I can just use > some kfifos too.
Can we rely on any ordering of completions? I was assuming that the use of linked lists instead of kfifos or lockless llists here was due to a need to remove arbitrary tasks. - Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
