On 12/20/2016 12:15 PM, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 02:38 PM, Andrew Patterson wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, December 9, 2016 at 3:33:57 PM UTC-7, Mike Christie wrote:
>>
>>     On 12/08/2016 10:55 AM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote:
>>     > I am trying to get iSCSI boot working on a debian-based system
>>     > using built-in uEFI iSCSI initiator firmware and broadcom
>>     > NICs (bnx2x).
>>     >
>>     > The debian initramfs uses the ibft support in iscsistart to log
>>     > into the root volume. The initramfs script uses iscsistart -N to
>>     > bring up the NICs before logging in with iscsstart -b. This
>>     > process works fine when using non-offload NICs, but fails when
>>     > using NICs using the bnx2, bnx2x, cxgb3, and cxgb4 drivers due to
>>     > the following code in
>>     > utils/fwparam_ibft/fw_entry.c:fw_setup_nics():
>>     >
>>     >         list_for_each_entry(context, &targets, list) {          
>>     >             /* if it is a offload nic ignore it */
>>     >             if (!net_get_transport_name_from_netdev(context->iface,
>>     >                                 transport))
>>     >                 continue
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > Which does a lookup in the table in usr/iscsi_net_util.c
>>     >
>>     >         static struct iscsi_net_driver net_drivers[] = {
>>     >             {"cxgb3", "cxgb3i" },
>>     >             {"cxgb4", "cxgb4i" },
>>     >             {"bnx2", "bnx2i" },
>>     >             {"bnx2x", "bnx2i"},
>>     >             {NULL, NULL}
>>     >         };
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > to see if -N should skip this NIC.  I cannot determine the reason
>>     > for this check. Do iscsi offload NICs not need to be configured
>>     > for boot? The current code causes iscsi boots to fail. I removed the
>>     > check and booting works fine.
>>     >
>>
>>     If you use the ibft net info for the nic, what do you use for the iscsi
>>     offload engine? 
>>
>>
>> I am not configuring it at boot (at least not yet). I haven't tried
>> using the boot support in the NIC firmware yet, just the uEFI iSCSI firmware
>> which will work with any NIC.
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>     Do they both have the same IP, and are you creating boot
>>     iscsi sessions through the offload engine?
>>
>>
>> I am not using offload yet. But I will probably need to get this working 
>> next.
>>
>>
>>
>>     cxgb*i is able to share the net info. The normal old nic engine and
>>     iscsi engine are able to use the same IP. That originally was not
>>     supposed to be allowed upstream, but it got in.
>>
>>     bnx2* is (or at least was when we wrote that code) not able to share the
>>     net info. The nic and iscsi engines need different IPs.
>>
>>
>> That makes some sense. The firmware has two different MAC addresses,
>> one for the NIC and one for iSCSI.
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>     So to cover both types we just use the ibft net info for the iscsi
>>     offload engines.
>>
>>     In the version of the code you are using is OFFLOAD_BOOT_SUPPORTED
>>     defined in open-iscsi/usr/iface.c or not?
>>
>>
>> Version 2.0.874. OFFLOAD_BOOT_SUPPORTED is in the code but not defined.
>>
>>
>>
>>     If it's not defined and you modified the code like you described, then I
>>     think you would use the ibft info to setup the normal old nic, and then
>>     you would end up creating a boot session using software iscsi. 
>>
>>
>> Yes, I believe that is the result I am getting.
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>     I am not
>>     100% sure about this last statement. I cannot remember and just looked
>>     at the code for a couple minutes.
>>
>>
>> I will try defining OFFLOAD_BOOT_SUPPORTED to see if that brings up the NIC.
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> I tried defining OFFLOAD_BOOT_SUPPORTED. The NIC is brought up but no
> IP is assigned. Is that expected? I have been using the uEFI iSCSI

It is expected for what you are doing. I misunderstood what you were
trying to do.

> driver which does not support hardware offload. I also have at least
> one bnx2x NIC that does not support iSCSI hardware offload:
> 
>     02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5719
>     Gigabit Ethernet PCIe (rev 01)
>     02:00.0 0200: 14e4:1657 (rev 01)
> 
> Do we need some sort of whitelist or a command-line flag to support these sort
> of configurations?
> 

I thought you wanted to use a iscsi offload engine in the broadcom card.
If you wanted to use a card that is in those offload lists for normal
old networking, have iscsistart bring it up and do iscsi root using
software iscsi, then yeah, I think we need some sort of flag.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to