> 4- Add a specific configuration option for the sessions to disable > automatic scans, as proposed by the patch. > > Pros: Finer grain control than any other option since we have per > session configuration. > > Cons: We have to add a configuration option to iscsid. > > I believe option 1 and 4 and the most reasonable. With option 1 > favoring not having to add a configuration parameter over finer control > of scans, and option 4 doing the opposite. > > I think that finer control of the scans is preferable (changing the > parameter name in the patch to "scan", with acceptable values "auto" and > "manual" instead) over using the scsi_mod configuration, but if adding > another configuration option is not acceptable I am willing to modify > the patch to use the other approach.
That sounds good to me. Want to take a shot at renaming things to better align with the scsi_mod.scan parameter where it makes sense? - Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
