On 8/15/06, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree that this is something that we should work out, and is the reason that I mentioned earlier that we might want a Kodo-specific PersistenceProvider at the end of the day. Seems like it's in everyone's best interests for multiple systems with different OpenJPA derivatives to behave deterministically.
I agree. Since it sounds like Abe is working out the initial re-organization of the ConfigurationProvider and ProductDerivation, I will wait for those changes before continuing with the OpenJPA derivative implementation. Thanks.
