+1My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo that is used by glassfish as with the time it takes to get anything done through official channels.
Craig On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/ javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually the final version of the spec: there are some minor (and binary- compatible) changes (some annotations don't have runtime retention, for example), but they are enough to prevent us from passing all the compatibility tests we need.The Geronimo API jar (http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/ org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar) is compliant, as far as I can tell.How do people feel about changing the dependency from persistence- api-1.0.jar to geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar? I've run through all our tests, and they pass with the Geronimo version. This would have the added advantage of unifying our spec jars to all be using the Geronimo versions.+1 indicates that you approve of the change -1 indicated that you disagree that the change should be made
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature