With 7 votes in favor and none against, the vote passes!
The vote thread can be viewed at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-open-jpa-dev/
200702.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've updated the dependencies in the pom.xml file and committed.
Thanks to all who voted!
On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
+1
On Feb 9, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
It turns out that the JPA API we've been building against (the one
from https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/
javax.persistence/jars/persistence-api-1.0.jar) is not actually
the final version of the spec: there are some minor (and binary-
compatible) changes (some annotations don't have runtime
retention, for example), but they are enough to prevent us from
passing all the compatibility tests we need.
The Geronimo API jar (http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/
maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar) is compliant, as far as I can tell.
How do people feel about changing the dependency from persistence-
api-1.0.jar to geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0.jar? I've run through all
our tests, and they pass with the Geronimo version. This would
have the added advantage of unifying our spec jars to all be using
the Geronimo versions.
+1 indicates that you approve of the change
-1 indicated that you disagree that the change should be made
