On Mar 1, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
The diff email didn't include enough context for you. This is in the createContainerEntityManagerFactory() method. It's my contention that createContainerEntityManagerFactory() will only be invoked by things that intend to close resources properly.
Cool. Thanks, Craig
-Patrick-- Patrick LinskeyBEA Systems, Inc.______________________________________________________________________ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return thisby email and then delete it.-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:38 AM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r513183 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/conf/ openjpa-lib/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/lib/conf/ openjpa-persistence/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/ Hi Patrick, I'm trying to understand how the code knows it's running in an appserver environment... Thanks, Craig On Mar 1, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:The difference is that in an appserver environment, thiswill return anon-finalizing EM by default, but in a Java SE environment, it will return a finalizing EM by default. See the last bit of mylast commentin OPENJPA-160. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc.______________________________________________________________ _________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:42 PM To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r513183 - in /incubator/openjpa/trunk: openjpa-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/conf/ openjpa-lib/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/lib/conf/ openjpa-persistence/src/main/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/ Hi Patrick, I don't quite understand the code that follows. What is the difference between this code and simply defaulting thevalue to non-finalizing impl? Craig On Feb 28, 2007, at 10:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:PersistenceUnitInfo pui, Map m) { PersistenceProductDerivation pd = new PersistenceProductDerivation(); try { + // if the BrokerImpl hasn't been specified,switch to the+ // non-finalizing one, since anything claimingto be acontainer + // should be doing proper resource management. + if (!Configurations.containsProperty(BrokerValue.KEY, + pui.getProperties()) + && !Configurations.containsProperty (BrokerValue.KEY, m)) { + m.put(BrokerValue.KEY, BrokerValue.NON_FINALIZING_ALIAS); + } + ConfigurationProvider cp = pd.load(pui, m); if (cp == null) return null;Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise Systemhttp://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!Craig RussellArchitect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ jdo408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature